i think the risks are somewhere there in the docs...probably in
fine print as is the usual case.
i don't know the legalities of it..
signed contract = you live with it even if you do not read the
fine print..
however, here the bank guy sells her the product knowing full
well she's unable to read.. he misrepresents the risks to her and
she signs the contract in good faith..
i would say the guy fraudulently misrepresented the contract to
entice her to sign it..
does that come under the law of tort?